Back to blog

The Costs of Hiring Manager Misalignment in Manufacturing

FactoryFix's Director of Onboarding, Halle Miroglotta, dives into the effects of misalignment between hiring managers and recruiters emphasizing the impact on the bottom line.

Throughout the years, after working with hundreds of manufacturing recruiters at FactoryFix, I've noticed a recruitment challenge more costly than the skills gap, rural location constraints, or even employer competition: hiring manager misalignment.

What does this misalignment look like? It's when qualified candidates who match the job description don't meet unstated manager expectations. It's when feedback from hiring managers comes too late—or not at all. It’s when recruiters have to watch great-fit candidates accept other offers while waiting for responses. And, of course, empty roles impact the business in many ways.

The Cost of Inaction

Each day that a manufacturing position remains unfilled creates a ripple effect of cascading costs:

The Candidate Reality

Hiring manager alignment impacts a recruiter's ability to respond quickly. In today’s competitive job market, applicants value employers who demonstrate efficient hiring processes. Candidates may even choose lower-paying positions if the hiring process shows better organization.

Given that candidates are moving this quickly through the hiring pipeline, manufacturing companies need strategies to stay aligned and competitive. Here's some actionable ways recruiters and hiring managers can align on processes and collaborate to win top talent:

Building Better Alignment: Action Steps

For Manufacturing Recruiters

Get hands-on: Tour the floor, document specific machinery requirements, and create clear skills checklists to understand the role. Update advertised job descriptions to reflect real priorities and provide hiring managers with labor market information as needed.

Process Management:

Quantify the Impact:

For Hiring Managers

Priority Alignment:

Commitment to Timeline:

Success Metrics

When hiring managers and recruiters commit to better alignment, the results are measurable. Companies that nail this alignment typically see:

ROI Calculator:

To calculate the daily cost of an unfilled position:

  1. Lost Production Revenue: (Hourly output × Price per unit × Hours per shift)
  2. Overtime Coverage: (Hourly rate × 1.5 × Overtime hours covered)
  3. Additional Impact: (Customer penalties + Rush orders + Training delays)

Total Daily Cost = Sum of above factors

Note: Each day of delay in hiring decisions can cost 3-4× the position's daily salary in combined lost productivity and opportunities.

Example: CNC Machinist Position

  1. Lost Production: 6 parts/hour × $200/part × 8 hours = $9,600/day
  2. Overtime: $28/hour × 1.5 × 8 hours = $336/day
  3. Impact: ($500 rush shipping + $400 penalties) = $900/day Total Daily Cost = $10,836

The pressures on both hiring managers and recruiters are real - production demands don't pause for hiring, and great candidates won't wait forever.

But when hiring managers and recruiters make small communication improvements to better align their priorities and processes, they can transform hiring from a source of friction into a genuine competitive advantage for their organization.